Factnet's Adminstrator Still Lying

Here is Mr. Factnet's (he also posts as 'nabashalam' when he's not moderating explanation in a recent reply to a member asking where me, Thor (who was 'Sammael' and "shadowcat" aka shadowkitty where at FactNet):

06-17-2012 03:31 PM #3

theadmin

Board Adminstrator

Join Date

Oct 2003

Posts

202

Smyrna, Shadowcat, and Sammael were banned from posting for one year. Sammael purposely used offensive language in order to get himself banned (it was his choice). Smyrna and Shadowcat set up a website attacking FACTnet, Lawrence Wollersheim (the website owner), the forum administration, and the moderators…all because one of our moderators wouldn’t allow them to continue engaging in ad hominem rhetoric (personally attacking other members of the forum and using inappropriate language).

These are the reasons you don’t see them around here, Father of a King. Sammael has 280 days and 2 hours left, Smyrna has 289 days and 3 hours left, and Shadowcat has 303 days and 15 hours left before they can post again.

Seems there isn’t much interest in Shepherds Chapel/Arnold Murray without Smyrna; but the subject is, of course, open for debate.

Mr. Factnet 

He was accurate about Sammael, but he went off the charts with false info regarding me and Shadowcat. First of all, Shadowcat was not instrumental in my publishing this blog. She has and is contributing info and articles when she so chooses. Furthermore I QUIT FactNet and the first articles on this blog explain why in great detail. 

I echo Thor's words in his previous article about how the Admins there actually talk like we are going to go back there after our one year bans!  First of all, these clowns live in an illusion. I can go back there anytime I wish, unless they want to totally shut down the site to new members. I just can't let on I'm Smyrna. But I could work around that very easily. I also take the references to us coming back there as a vague admission they were culpable in the turmoil that came of the admin's behavior as briefly outlined below.

The arrogance of "Mr. FactNet" is mind-boggling. This is a guy who orchestrated a deception where an atheist and admitted board troll was made moderator over the Christian forums at FactNet. When members complained about this, he then gave that same atheist troll another user name, and claimed he was a different person, a Methodist minister of all things. After pulling a stunt like that, HE should have been banned or at the very least had any authority as an administrator removed. 

And this troll/atheist I'm talking about is a world class hypocrite and countless examples of his ad hominem rhetoric can be cited at FactNet. To single me out and claim I was banned for it is just a load of bullshit, and this is why this blog was formed, as well as to defend the Shepherd's Chapel without any concern about liberal, atheist, hypocrite moderators that side with those of the same ilk, who have no problem abusing their own rules by using them as weapons. 

 

 

Thor Fires On All Cylindars Regarding Franklin

The guy known as Jeff Franklin, who for a long time was FactNet.org's resident loon on the forums there, publishes his own site as Thor pointed out. I don't mind plugging it either, it is entertaining: cultbustersgalactica.yuku.com  One experiment I did with that site a while ago was to check Franklin's sources for his articles. Franklin is a proud Conservative, but you'd never know it going by his opinions and sources for the copy/paste articles he posts on his site. Most are published by Liberals!

He started that site because he was booted off cbrefugeecamp.yuku.com for about the fourth time when one counts the old "Culbusters" website. He's so paranoid, he won't let anyone join his site's forums. So far only himself, some fruitcake named Sharon and his own sock puppet invention "Kerrie" are the only members that are active. There is a guy named Rory who mainly uses his affiliation with Franklin's site to plug his book, but I doubt its very effective, since virtually no one reads all that garbage. Some woman named Robin too, but she isn't very active at all. Franklin has a standing challenge to debate anyone who wants to debate him, but it is an empty, phony challenge. First of all, from my own direct experience, Franklin is incapable of true debate.

You cannot debate anyone if they refuse to acknowledge their opponent's points,  or support any of their accusations with any evidence.  One only has to see how this idiot behaves during discussions at FactNet.org's forums (he posts as jeff_franklin there, here's an example: Franklin's Lunacy) and it's true he is one of the most intolerant and hypocritical people I've ever encountered.

All in all though, because of his quirkiness, Franklin has always been an incredibly entertaining guy, mainly when he's trying to be serious.